India-native

Built for India, not localised for it.

DPDP-first, not GDPR-retrofitted.

There is a difference between a global platform with an India region and a platform whose data model was designed around the DPDP Act. Localisation translates the labels. India-native means the schema, the consent logic, the residency, and the contracting were India-first from the start.

Book a Demo DPDP-native vs GDPR-adapted →

What India-native means

Five things you can't bolt on afterwards.

Each of these is a design decision, not a configuration toggle — which is why a retrofitted product struggles to match them.

22 Eighth Schedule languages

Native support for English plus all 22 Eighth Schedule languages, with per-language SHA-256 content hashes so a notice replays exactly what the principal saw — not a manual translation layer over an English template.

INR contracting

All contracts in INR. No USD, no EUR. Built and priced for the Indian enterprise market, with flat annual licensing rather than per-consent metering.

ap-south-1 residency

Primary deployment in AWS ap-south-1 (Mumbai). No cross-border transfer of personal data by default — residency is the starting position, not an add-on region.

DPBI-shaped breach workflows

The breach module runs the §8(6) 72-hour countdown to the Data Protection Board of India, with India-specific notification content and the CERT-In 6-hour deadline for critical incidents built in.

DPDP-first schema

The data model encodes the §6 consent vs §7 legitimate-use split, Rule 3 notice anchoring, and hash-chained consent at the schema level — it was never a GDPR schema with India fields added.

Provision mapping

Every obligation, mapped to a module.

DPOs and legal teams think in statute sections. So does Vishwaas — here is the India-native obligation set mapped to the module that operationalises it.

Provision	Obligation	Vishwaas module
§5	Notice before processing	Privacy Notice Management →
§6 · Rule 3	Free, specific, informed consent + notice gate	Consent Lifecycle (hash-chained ledger) →
§7	Legitimate-use sub-grounds (no consent required)	Processing activity register →
§8(6)	Breach notification to DPBI + principals	Breach Management (72h countdown) →
§§11–14	Access, correction, erasure, grievance, nomination	DPR Management (90-day SLA) →
Rule 3	Itemised notice in English + 22 languages	Notice gate workflows →
Rule 4	Consent Manager registration & interoperability	Consent Manager-ready architecture →
Cl.10	Significant Data Fiduciary duties (DPIA, audit, board report)	DPIA + SDF compliance pack →

Native vs retrofit

Why retrofit always leaves a seam.

A law-specific product carries its origin law in its bones. Adapting it to a different law shows.

A GDPR schema bends to fit

Lawful bases, breach authority, language set, and residency default were all chosen for the EU. India fields get added on top — and the §6/§7 split, Rule 3 gate, and Eighth Schedule obligation are where the fit gets loose.

A DPDP schema starts where India does

Consent vs legitimate use, notice anchoring, the DPBI countdown, INR contracting, and ap-south-1 residency are the defaults — so there's no seam to manage and no India obligation that has to be retrofitted in.

See an India-first platform, not an India region.

30 minutes on your real notices, your §6/§7 split, and your residency requirements — built for India's law from the schema up.

Book a Demo See the full DPDP Act mapping →