Vishwaas AI Vishwaas AI
Book a Demo
Comparison

Vishwaas AI vs Privy (IDfy).

Consent capture is the start. Provable operations is the product.

Privy by IDfy is an India-based consent product with strong identity heritage. The DPDP question a DPBI inquiry asks is narrower: can you prove a consent record was not altered after the fact, and is the rest of your privacy operation — notices, DPR, breach, DPIA, vendors — on the same evidence-grade footing? We compare mechanisms and scope, not slogans.

Book a DemoBack to all comparisons →
Capture vs proof

Recording consent is table stakes. Proving it is the product.

A consent log records that consent happened. Under DPDP, the regulator's next question is whether the record is the same one written that day — and whether your notices, rights, and breach evidence are equally defensible.

CriterionPrivy (IDfy)Vishwaas AI
Consent evidence mechanism✕Consent capture + audit log✓SHA-256 hash chain + RSA signatures + RFC 3161 timestamps
Tamper-evidence✕Audit trail, vendor-attested✓Structural — any post-hoc change visibly breaks the chain
Independent verification✕Trust the platform✓Independently verifiable without trusting Vishwaas
Scope beyond consent✕Consent + identity focus✓15 modules — notices, DPR, breach, DPIA, vendor, audit, propagation
Eighth Schedule 22 languages✕Supported for capture flows✓Per-language SHA-256 notice hashing across all 22 languages
Rule 4 Consent Manager posture✕Identity-led posture✓India-incorporated, built to register
India data residency✕India-based✓ap-south-1, no cross-border transfer
Why scope matters

A consent point tool leaves the operation uncovered.

DPDP is not only a consent obligation.

Where a consent-first tool stops

Capturing consent cleanly is necessary but not sufficient. When the Board asks for the notice version a principal saw, the §17 reason a rights request was refused, the §8(6) breach timeline, or the processor DPA covering a cross-border flow, a consent-capture product has nothing to produce. Vishwaas treats consent as one hash-chained module inside a single operating layer — so the same evidence grade extends to notices, DPR, breach, DPIA, and vendor governance, and every record is independently verifiable rather than vendor-attested.
Comparisons are based on publicly available information as of June 2026. Verify capabilities against current vendor documentation.

See evidence-grade consent — and everything around it.

30 minutes with a privacy engineer: we walk the hash chain, verify a signature live, and show notices, DPR, and breach on the same evidence footing.

Book a DemoWhy Vishwaas proof is different →